Rajasekhara was a poet in a, very true sense and. always^ app'feciates lyrical harmony and grand eloquence^ His masterly command of the more elaborate metres is noteworthy. Hi& Repetitions and proverbial expressions are. something very striking, jSb*a dramatist, he is nbt perfect. At least, he is
only an imitator there..... / ; .
.,' , • ... •. -....' , •.,
Murari was the son of Vardhamana and Tantumatidevi &nd of the Moudgalyagotra. He is .quoted by Ratnakara, and the latter flourished at the court of Avantivarnxan (855—884. A. D.) In the introduction to his Anargha Raghava it is said that the audience were terrified by the representation of a play which was full of sentiments of anger, terror and .disgust and probably the reference is to Bhavabhuti's Malati-Madhava-Accordingly his work was meant to remove-the unpleasant feelings of the audience. The plot is made up of the story of Rama and owing to the eloquence of the narration he has been named Bara-Valrniki. The play has no dramatic beauty and it is more fit for the hall than for the stage. His diction is inscrutable and: his ideas are far-fetched and im most cases unnatural. Anyhow toe shows himself a. master .of scholarly reading and ready vocabulary. Viewed,as :ciassic poetry, his work finds a middle place in the poetic pantheon. . * . '
Damodaramisra was a poet of the court of JBhoja of Dhair and so flourished in the latter half of the tenth century A. Z>» Hmwman-,nataka or Maha-nataka is a drama ,in 14 acts, the story of.Rama with .special prdmiaence to The tradition is .that the ..original was composed by Bfilmiawi himself, who threw itJntd tte «x;«ar^,a§ ties thought Vltoijcl's wqrfe .described Rama's Jife better. Tiic* slabs on which the work was written! wef s. jdi^cijyered by at* •of his writings.congratulation*